Analysis of The Apology by Plato

The Apology was compose by Plato, and relates Socrates defense at his trial on charges of degrading the youth and impiety. Socrates argues that he is unprejudiced of both charges. His defense is in the end unsuccessful, and he is convicted and sentenced to death. Socrates concludes the Apology by arguing that a yet man should waste no fear of death.\n[Note that this introductory paragraph concisely does 2 things: it sets up the issue to be discussed, and it in short presents the position of the Socrates on the main topics (his innocence and his view of death). huge background histories and so on are not infallible in these papers derive straight to the point.\nSocrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his public prosecutor Meletus in cardinal ways. genius way consists of a verbal description of Socrates motivation and method, which he hopes pull up stakes explain to the jury wherefore some people, including his prosecutors, dislike him. The help defense consists of Socrates responding directly to the both charges brought against him: corrupting the young and impiety, or more specifically, not accept in the gods in whom the metropolis believes (p. 28). Ill address these two lines of defense in turn. I wrote this second paragraph to illuminate the argumentative structure of the paper. I could have also feature this second paragraph with the outgrowth one, but it seemed more essential to separate it in this case.\nWhen I thought some Socrates defense, it seemed to me that it had two main disjoints: the bump where he explains why he has a bad reputation, and the part where he responds directly to the charges against him. The initiatory paragraphs are usually the hardest ones to write. You have to stop and phone about what the main thesis or theses of the paper are, and also think about the main argument(s) for them. Fortunately, formerly youve thought about these things, the recess of the paper usually travel into place. Socrates begins his defense by ...