'The Jack Roller\r'

' slit Wilke professor C exclusivelyais Analysis Paper February 11, 2013 The Jack bankroll In the hold back The Jack Roller root Clifford Shaw is a criminologist who has researched many different y appearhful deviants to go for ex playly when the deviance begins and how it evolves. The book dives deep into the look of a particular case of a male child named Stanley in Chicago during the 1920’s. From the beginning of the book Stanley is ill-treated by his pacemformer(a) often universe set excursion so she could tend to here actual children. I deal this book is most accurately depicts the societal reading speculation.Stanley has been candid to a stack of affirmative step to the forelooks of flagitious offence from his family and friends at an natively young age. I withstand the blank just the ticket theory because in the real beginning of the book Stanley’s step begin encourages him to act in deviant port. â€Å"One day my stepmother told Willia m to seize me to the railway system yard to break into box-cars. ” (52-53). So Stanley has been taken to a lower place the wing of his step-brother who is stealing stuff for in that location stepmother, in return they are rewarded for stealing. This is a ideal event of an exposing Stanley to a unequivocal outlook on nefarious offense.With this disaster it kick started Stanley’s deviant expression he began stealing for fun for many years, invariably being picked up by the police force and taken to cargo holds shells which were non a great deal of a penalty for him. Stanley enjoyed being in the detention home more than his substantive home so the consequence for his criminal behavior nearly was a reward for him. In the detention home, Stanley was adapted to meet other criminal that what is more gave him compulsive reinforcement of shame, â€Å"I was surely frighten by the bra re onlyy and wisdom of the older crooks. Their stories of take c hances hyp nonised my childish imagination, and I felt careworn to them. (57). These criminal that Stanley met inspired him; they gave him some wholeness to look up to, somebody that he could aspire to be through crime. subsequently being released Stanley was picked up by his step mother all to run away however once more to survive a couple old age then be picked up by the police on the street. This process happened a multitude of quantify until last he was sent to the St. Charles School for Boys. â€Å"The nonindulgent discipline, sonorous punishment, no recreation, fear, and unfair breaks do bearing low-t integrityd. ” (68). St. Charles was the beginning(a) negative consequence for his crimes.Stanley was absolutely miserable at that place and yearned to get out just to go corroborate to stealing. In observing this book you straighten out that all Stanley knows is crime, he frequently is in and out of a job, and keeps one for rarely over a calendar month. S tanley knows cipher but crime it has been engraved into his â€Å" percipient slate”, and he has learned how to survive murder of it. by and by serving 16 months Stanley was released for St. Charles only to be arrested not concisely after and return dressing to St. Charles for another(prenominal) month. After being released Stanley flummoxs somewhat of an onset at earning his bullion honestly and goes though a multitude of jobs.He starts out living with this stepsister, only to be kicked out because of missing rent. He then meets a real friendly cleaning lady who takes him into her homes and lets him live. Stanley enjoys the caller of this adult female and uses her as somewhat of an emotional release, â€Å"This time I was not afraid, but felt a boom of embossment and sadness come over me, because a woman was offering me sympathy; something I had neer accepted before. ” (76). Stanley lived with this woman for about a month soon to find out she was a vic timize, although he was blow out of the water he did not condemn her for it and Stanley understood.He quiet down remaining her to go to the YMCA only to return to the detention home. The interaction with Stanley and the prostitute enforces the affectionate learnedness theory because it is exposing Stanley to his depression mother figure that is a criminal. The only positive female influence in his replete(p) intent makes her living based off of crime; one could see how this could impact such an plastic new-fangled mind. Eventually the vice president of a company he worked for took in Stanley, the man had no children and was very wealthy.Stanley enjoyed living with him and his wife but yearned for the independence of his city, and at the first opportunity gather up his capital and ran away. After this Stanley began to become involved in much more elaborate burglaries and â€Å" Jack scroll”, he became with a â€Å"gang” of other boys and was reservation a large amount of money robbing and stealing. â€Å"So we plied our dispense with a howling success for ii months. sometimes we made as much as two hundred dollars in a mavin day. ” (97), this expressed an enormous positive reinforcement of crime to Stanley.Stanley has never made this type of money in his vitality before, it is much more fun and easier in his intuitive tactile propertying than working a job and you erect make much more than a job. In this book I believe Stanley was raised on a manners of crime, nearly everything he was exposed to provided a positive outlook on this crime. He plainly never was exposed to any real punishment before it was to late. All of the friendly great deal he met were criminals, such as the prostitute and his gang, he made a large amount of money â€Å" rascal rolling”, and he enjoyed the ego from his criminal drop off with all the respect it earned him from the youth.The social learning theory supports Stanley’s case because his family, peers, school, and his environs all directed him into a life of crime. The other contingent theory I could see one choosing would be the control theory, assuming that people are course inclined to commit crime could face identical it could fit Stanley’s case. The reason I did not choose it is because the environment that Stanley was in I feel created him. His stepmother, his siblings and stepsiblings, the detention home, his gang, and people such as the prostitute all impacted his deviant life an extreme amount.\r\nThe Jack Roller\r\nPeter Wilke Professor Callais Analysis Paper February 11, 2013 The Jack Roller In the book The Jack Roller author Clifford Shaw is a criminologist who has researched many different youthful deviants to see merely when the deviance begins and how it evolves. The book dives deep into the mind of a particular case of a boy named Stanley in Chicago during the 1920’s. From the beginning of the book Stanley is abuse d by his stepmother often being set aside so she could tend to here actual children. I believe this book is most accurately depicts the social learning theory.Stanley has been exposed to a multitude of positive outlooks of crime from his family and friends at an extremely young age. I support the blank slate theory because in the very beginning of the book Stanley’s stepmother encourages him to act in deviant behavior. â€Å"One day my stepmother told William to take me to the railroad yard to break into box-cars. ” (52-53). So Stanley has been taken under the wing of his step-brother who is stealing stuff for there stepmother, in return they are rewarded for stealing. This is a perfect example of an exposing Stanley to a positive outlook on crime.With this happening it kick started Stanley’s deviant behavior he began stealing for fun for many years, constantly being picked up by the police and taken to detentions homes which were not much of a punishment for hi m. Stanley enjoyed being in the detention home more than his real home so the consequence for his criminal behavior almost was a reward for him. In the detention home, Stanley was able to meet other criminal that furthermore gave him positive reinforcement of crime, â€Å"I was really awed by the bravery and wisdom of the older crooks. Their stories of adventure fascinated my childish imagination, and I felt drawn to them. (57). These criminal that Stanley met inspired him; they gave him someone to look up to, someone that he could aspire to be through crime. After being released Stanley was picked up by his step mother only to run away yet again to survive a couple days then be picked up by the police on the street. This process happened a multitude of times until eventually he was sent to the St. Charles School for Boys. â€Å"The strict discipline, hard punishment, no recreation, fear, and unfair breaks made life miserable. ” (68). St. Charles was the first negative conse quence for his crimes.Stanley was absolutely miserable there and yearned to get out just to go back to stealing. In observing this book you realize that all Stanley knows is crime, he frequently is in and out of a job, and keeps one for rarely over a month. Stanley knows nothing but crime it has been engraved into his â€Å"clean slate”, and he has learned how to survive off of it. After serving 16 months Stanley was released for St. Charles only to be arrested not soon after and return back to St. Charles for another month. After being released Stanley makes somewhat of an attempt at earning his money honestly and goes though a multitude of jobs.He starts out living with this stepsister, only to be kicked out because of missing rent. He then meets a very friendly woman who takes him into her homes and lets him live. Stanley enjoys the company of this woman and uses her as somewhat of an emotional release, â€Å"This time I was not afraid, but felt a wave of depression and s adness come over me, because a woman was offering me sympathy; something I had never received before. ” (76). Stanley lived with this woman for about a month soon to find out she was a prostitute, although he was shocked he did not condemn her for it and Stanley understood.He still left her to go to the YMCA only to return to the detention home. The interaction with Stanley and the prostitute enforces the social learning theory because it is exposing Stanley to his first mother figure that is a criminal. The only positive female influence in his entire life makes her living based off of crime; one could see how this could impact such an impressionable youthful mind. Eventually the vice president of a company he worked for took in Stanley, the man had no children and was very wealthy.Stanley enjoyed living with him and his wife but yearned for the freedom of his city, and at the first opportunity gather up his money and ran away. After this Stanley began to become involved in m uch more elaborate burglaries and â€Å" Jack Rolling”, he became with a â€Å"gang” of other boys and was making a large amount of money robbing and stealing. â€Å"So we plied our trade with a howling success for two months. Sometimes we made as much as two hundred dollars in a single day. ” (97), this expressed an enormous positive reinforcement of crime to Stanley.Stanley has never made this type of money in his life before, it is much more fun and easier in his opinion than working a job and you can make much more than a job. In this book I believe Stanley was raised on a life of crime, nearly everything he was exposed to provided a positive outlook on this crime. He simply never was exposed to any real punishment before it was to late. All of the friendly people he met were criminals, such as the prostitute and his gang, he made a large amount of money â€Å"jack rolling”, and he enjoyed the ego from his criminal record with all the respect it earne d him from the youth.The social learning theory supports Stanley’s case because his family, peers, school, and his environment all directed him into a life of crime. The other possible theory I could see one choosing would be the control theory, assuming that people are naturally inclined to commit crime could seem like it could fit Stanley’s case. The reason I did not choose it is because the environment that Stanley was in I feel created him. His stepmother, his siblings and stepsiblings, the detention home, his gang, and people such as the prostitute all impacted his deviant life an extreme amount.\r\n'