David Suzukis A Planet For The Taking :: essays research papers

David Suzukis A planet for the Taking     In the essay "A Planet for the Taking," David Suzuki describesCanadians odd clench for this great natural bounty we call our own. Heis an internationally acclaimed scientist who is refer about the welfargon ofCanada. Suzukis intended audience is the Canadian population that does notrealize the grave danger they argon instilling upon themselves by willy-nillytaking our resources without looking at the subsequent repercussions of theiractions. The essay is persuasive and informative. He comp atomic number 18s various facetsof science and gives reasons why none of these fields sess develop why we atomic number 18destroying nature.     The organization of the essay supports the authors views well. Itbegins with general opinions about the Canadian population and is followed bymore detailed explanations. The general opinions in the arising are well-chosen considering the audience. Suzukis ton e is evident when he states "We obligate two a sense of the importance of the wilderness and space in our agricultureand an attitude that it is limitless and in that respectfore we neednt worry." Thesewords suggest that we are spontaneous to reap the rewards of our vast resources butwe fail to see the harm that we are doing, and will continue to do if we do notstop these actions.     Although his show up for explaining his beliefs changes, Suzukis toneof great concern remains consistent throughout the essay. after his views arepresented, Suzuki begins to tell us what we have done to our country and how weare destroying it. Present day Canadians are compared to native Canadians whichsuccessfully serves its purpose in illustrating how, for centuries, raft livedoff the natural resources in Canada. With the development of science andtechnology, we have developed better ways of mass harvesting resources but thesemethods are taking at a faster rate than n ature can sustain. Science suggestsmeans of replacing these resources we are taking but there is no quickreplacement for ecosystems that have taken thousands of years to evolve.      chase his explanations of how we have destroyed nature, Suzukidiscusses science and how society deals with it, "I believe that in large partour problems rest on our faith in the forefinger of science and technology." Thisstatement and the following sentences are used to describe how race deal withgreat developments in science and technology. Because there have been so manygreat advances in these fields in the past century, people are comfortableplacing their faith in science though scientists are still far from discoveringall of the secrets to the universe. Scientists interfere with nature without