Movements fighting for gay marriages Essay

The jocund wedding party debate has been persistent every(prenominal) over the world. It is a dissentious political issue that holds out a lot of conflict. In ground forces for instance, movements fighting for cheery marriages and their rights started as early as 1970s. In the 1990s it was a great political issue. The US federal political sympathies has non legitimatised sprightly marriages although some press outs like mommy each(prenominal)ow civil unions. laughable couples in US do not shargon same rights as on-key couples since their marriages atomic number 18 not considered legitimate. Without marriage laws to protect their rights and benefits such couples organisation turmoils in their relationships.For instance automatic inheritance with wipeout of a partner and making heavy decision for instance sign language for emergency medical operations is not allowed. USA should follow Denmark, Netherlands and Canada and judicialize intrepid marriages as a step for ward to reducing hatred crimes in beau monde and thus promoting br other(a)ly order. Again, since most citizenry who homecomingbalance it desires it do so on the understructure of religious values the blasphemous values and desires of the sight argon not considered. It should draw the line amid the state and the church so that it gives all people in the purchase order.Legalizing alert marriages impart see the decline of HIV-AIDS transmission, as courageous couples ordain improver their sense of responsibility for each other. courageous couples should not be denied significant rights like access to partners insurance or medical decision making, workers and recompense benefits. Benefits under annuity and retirement plans all which are important (http//marriageequity. com/facts/index. htm) By not legalizing gay marriage the law discriminates on the basis of commove since ones ability to marriage depends on ones sex.Cuba has recently started to involve and respect g ay couples by redefining marriage to accommodate all people in society, as socialism should be all inclusive. (http//asp. usatoday. com/ club/utils/idmap/13917955. story) Discrimination against gay couples will be abolished and their unions or marriages will be legalized It is ironic that US the worlds leading countries in democracy restricts gay marriages while it should be advocating and fighting for matesity of all marriages. jolly marriages should be legalized and couples should be entitled to social security benefits and vindication under federal pension laws.This would reduce instances where on death of a partner one cannot access the partners benefits. In encase the family had children such benefits would be of great importance in master(prenominal)taining the childrens welfare. Without legal bulwark gay couples face economic hardships that would have been eradicated had their marriage been legalized. due south Africa and Belgium have also embraced it and marriages bet ween same sex couples receive blessings. Today, most children are born out of wedlock to single parents marriages end separate and the family as a unit that provides the appropriate atmosphere for children to grow is loosing the grip.Children are still being brought up successfully outside the conceived perfect surroundings of the family. alert marriages should be legalized so as allow partners elucidate important decisions like medical based decisions. It will allow one make important decision that would save the partners life. Arguments in brave out of gay marriages The governments purpose is to ensure that peoples rights are consider and that equality is maintained. It is thence fair that gay marriages be legalized. If gay marriages are recognized gay couples would take the advantage of automatic inheritance in case of death of one partner.Without such gay couples inherit vigour of what they have worked hard for with their partner. Both straight and gay couples should hav e equal rights. (http//angelfire. com/home /leah/index. hypertext markup language) It is argued that gay relationships are not biologically natural as they cannot produce children of their own naturally. Culturally marriage is the institution that forms and upholds societal and social values and norms. trades unions ensure the continuity of society by means of procreation. It is therefore argued that society would suffer if gay marriages were to be legalized, as the continuam would be interrupted.Gay marriages should be legalized and efforts by the church t use religious values and dreadful them on all people in society are uncalled for. at that place should be a clear distinction between the church and the state so that the state operates independently to accommodate all its citizens including the secular minded. (Snyder, 2006) Legalizing gay marriages will help create order and stability in society. When legalized the main society will change their rigid perception that gay ma rriage is illegal and they will fit well with them. This will reduce gay-based hate crimes.The whole society will have social unity and dissimilarity against gay people will reduce. Unions to guide gay couple on how to raise their children can only be effective if gay marriages were legalized. This would counter the aim that gay couples are not good in bring up children. The unions can help create good parenthood through training. Arguments against gay marriages It is argued that legalizing gay marriages will be a step towards take anti-social behaviour. Just as gay couple seek for assist and protection of their rights so would other absurd groups.Moral decadency is likely to communicate in society. It would pave way for polygamy, incest and beastiality legalization all of which are not good for society. Traditionally marriage is between a cosmos and a wo part and not same sex parties. Gay marriages are therefore against the traditional perception of marriage and should be dis couraged. Naturally marriage should be between 2 people of different sexes. Attraction between two people of same sex is considered unnatural gay marriages should therefore add together to a halt. Marriage should be an institution between a man and a cleaning woman.And those gay marriages are unlawful. God created a woman for the man and not a man for a man or woman for another. Gay couples choose to be gay and should not seek attention for the choices they have made in life. (Hohengarten, 1994) Parents pose as role models to their children. Gay parents are likely to bring up gay children and this will not be good for society. Supporters of this viewpoint argue that children need heterosexual parents to develop. This would be lacking in the gay families and consequently poor child development.The supra reasons face much criticism. For instance linking procreation strongly with marriage undermines the other purposes of marriage. Procreation is not the only reason why people marry . Those who support gay marriages consider this point of view incompetent on the basis that there are sterile or barren couples or women at their post menopausal age who marry. The question posed is whether such marriages ought to be considered null since they wont bear children. Again marriage could be for sexual satisfaction companionship and moral expression. (Strasser, 2002)Another problem with the argument that gay marriage is immoral is that who defines marriage and what is moral or immoral calls for another debate altogether. People have different perception more or less what is moral or immoral. Using religious values to support annihilation of gay marriages by quoting the bible is inappropriate especially to a rural area that accommodates diverse religions. This is an insufficient approach as freedom of religion will be compromised. Why install your religious aspects to life on people who are for a secular approach to life? (http//atheism. about. com/6/9/007160.hypertext markup language) The argument that children need heterosexual parents to grow and develop is quite shallow. on that point are cases where their development is jeopardized despite them having heterosexual parents. Children need good nurturing, play care and love from their parents to develop. Again gay parents are more likely to bring up straight children to spare them the throe of discrimination they have through. (Ross, 2002) Some gay people are not gay by choice but by birth. Argument that gay couples are naturally attracted to same sex partners outdoes the argument that gay marriages are unnatural.Nature should take its course and they should be allowed to marry those they are attracted to disregardless of their sex. (Pierson et al, 2005) Arguments raised against legalizing gay marriages on the basis of their instability are uncalled for since the straight marriages have proved to be 7% more instable compared to gay marriages. In the USA only two states legalize gay marriage s that are Massachusetts and Lowa though they call them civil unions. The federal government under the defense lawyers of Marriage Act of 1996 leaves the states to decide on which approach to handle its issues.Gay couples want their marriages to be legalized. This will eradicate the discrimination they face, as society is not comfortable with them and view them as outcast with legalization gay couples can gain recognition. (Mello, 2004) The church is used by politicians for their own interests. Politicians are careful in discussing critical issues like whether to legalize or not legalize gay marriages. They are cautious not to offend the people who will determine their stay in government through voting. Conclusion. Gay couples have their rights to be happy.Happiness in marriage would be with the soulfulness one is attracted to and willing to be intimate with. Denying gay couples that happiness and stressful to impose the person they should marry in terms of gender would be deprivi ng them their rights. The government should ensure that the rights of all citizens are preserved. If gay marriages were legalized the HIV-AIDS prevalence would decline. This is because gay couples would increase their commitment towards their marriages. Forcing people to marry those they are not attracted to is a major reason for increased divorce rates.ReferencesAustin Cline. 2007. Gay Marriage and church/state separation. Retrieved on 16th October 2007 from http//atheism. about. com/6/9/007160. html Leah Moore. 2001. Points in defense of gay marriages. Retrieved on 16th October 2007 from http//angelfire. com/home /leah/index. html USA Today. 2007. When it comes to gay rights, Is Cuba ahead of USA? Retrieved on 16th October 2007 from http//asp. usatoday. com/community/utils/idmap/13917955. story Mello, Michael. 2004. Legalizing gay marriages. University Press. Pierceson, Jason, Courts 2005. Liberalism and Rights Gay Law and Politics in the