Europe And The New World :: essays research papers fc

Europe and the New WorldTutorial movement Why were the westerners (Spanish, English, Portugueses, French etc) able to disarrange the native packs of America with, seemingly, relative ease? Was this evidence of a passe-partout civilisation?Many believe that there is a bully unlikeness between westerners and the native people of the lands they conquered. The truth is, that there is non great distinction, except in the minds of white men. Westerners such as the French, Spanish, English and Portuguese drive home always believed in their own superiority. This confidence gave them the strength to displace the natives and also the justification for doing so. The civilized world seemed to grow, and change with new directions cosmos mastered all the time, the non civilized world seemed to stand still in a era recognized by Europeans as unprogressive and primitive. The Europeans viewed the inseparable Americans with mixed opinion, in many ways they despised their ignorance, while a t the same time being in awe of their innocence. Despite this, ahead(p) opinion was that the native people of the new world were outclassed to the Europeans and would have to become domesticated if they were to survive in the new world. However was this exult over the inhabitants of the land evidence of a superior civilisation? How does whiz define Civilisation? For if we are to discuss what is a superior and an inferior race then understanding of the term civilisation is critical. The term civilisation is used everyday and is understood by everyone, in time a decent definition is more difficult to pin down. The oxford university dictionary defines civilisation as a developed or advanced sate of human society. This is helpful, yet the question of how developed or how advanced is still relevant. Others have state that a civilized society is different from an uncivilized society because of certain(prenominal) attributes such as writing, cities, building etc. But agreement is di fficult, it is more than more safer not to rely on a single definition, quite look at examples of what everyone has agreed to call civilisations such as Grecian or Rome . However, the term civilisation still seems to be from a western point of view, for natives are not seen as civilized because they do not fit into any definition mentioned above. The Native Americans were not advanced, they did not have buildings or cities and their lifestyle and customs had hardly resembled that of Greece or Rome.