Abortion - Man Cant Be Rightly Disposed of by Man :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Abortion - Man Cant Be Rightly abandoned of by Man Temporal life story lived in this world is non identified with the person. The person possesses as his own a level of life that is more than profound and that can non end. Bodily life is a fundamental good, hither below it is the condition for all other goods. just there ar higher values for which it could be legitimate or even unavoidable to be willing to expose oneself to the risk of losing bodily life. In a society of persons the common good is for each individual an end which he must serve and to which he must subordinate his particular interest. But it is not his last end and, from this point of view, it is society which is at the assistance of the person, because the person will not fulfill his destiny except in God. The person can be definitively subordinated only to God. Man can neer be treated simply as a means to be disposed of in order to obtain a higher end. In regard to the mutual chastises and duties of the person and of society, it departs to moral teaching to enlighten consciences it belongs to the justice to specify and organize external behavior. There is precisely a sure number of rights which society is not in a position to allow since these rights precede society but society has the function to preserve and to visit them. These are the greater part of those which are today called human rights and which our climb on boasts of having formulated. The first right of the human person is his life. He has other goods and whatsoever are more precious, but this one is fundamental-- the condition of all the others. thus it must be protected above all others. It does not belong to society, nor does it belong to public authority in any form to spot this right for some and not for others all discrimination is evil, whether it be founded on race, sex, color or religion. It is not recognition by another that constitutes this right. This right is antecedent to its recognition it dem ands recognition and it is strictly unjust to refuse it. either discrimination based on the various stages of life is no more justified than any other discrimination. The right to life remains manage in an old person, even one greatly weakened it is not lost by one who is incurably sick.