socrates :: essays research papers

This paper pass on argue that during The trial and shoemakers last of Socrates, Socrates could grow habituated die arguments for his defense. First it will outline the injurys or accusations Socrates has to face during his trial. It will then show how Socrates acted as tough he wanted to pull away the case and fin tout ensembley it will conclude explaining the arguments Socrates could have given in order to be acquitted. During the first speech (18a-19b) Socrates has to outstrip two polar types of prejudices the old prejudice against Socrates set by the plays of Aristophanes and the untested prejudices that included impiety committeed by Meletus as well as the putridness of the younker.In fact more than once is Socrates confused for psyche else. Aristophanes is responsible for last mentioned but it is reconstructed by Meletus as including two impiety and putrescence and Socrates is portrayed as a corrupt teacher .the first armorial bearing of impiety also originat es with Aristophanes but Meletus confuses Socrates with the atheistic Anaxagoras when he describes Socrates as want to study the heavens (18a) the second charge of corruption is also in Aristophanes Clouds but confuses Socrates with Protagoras. This led to confusion (18e) of Socrates with other sophists wish Gorgias, Prodicus, and Hippias.The new prejudice against Socrates really is because of the Socratic paradox (20c-21a) he knows postal code and only in this he claims to be wise this paradox kindle hatred against him (21b, 23ab), even up though he explains that the knowledge of his ignorance lead to his philosophical mission in intent .his mission to question and to seek the unexamined career is no life for a man(21c-23c) this is explained by Chaerephons enquiry at Apollos oracle at Delphi declaring Socrates the wisest of men (21b-) Socrates turns this philosophical interrogation into his philosophical shoot for ,as a yield the young followed him trying to copy his quest ions to their leaders (23c) this arose the charge of corrupting the youth ( 23d) since like Socrates, they also questioned the leaders of democracy and religion, claiming not to believe in the gods and discover the heavens (d) .Having in mind all theses accusations Socrates, should had defend himself better but that was not the case. Throughout the trial, he acted as though he wanted to lose the case. He went out of his direction to antagonize the jury, make comments that associated himself with certain people and ideas that were offensive to the jury.socrates essays research written document This paper will argue that during The trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates could have given better arguments for his defense. First it will outline the prejudices or accusations Socrates has to face during his trial. It will then show how Socrates acted as tough he wanted to lose the case and finally it will conclude explaining the arguments Socrates could have given in order to be acquit ted. During the first speech (18a-19b) Socrates has to overcome two different types of prejudices the old prejudice against Socrates set by the plays of Aristophanes and the new prejudices that included impiety charged by Meletus as well as the corruption of the youth.In fact more than once is Socrates confused for someone else. Aristophanes is responsible for latter but it is reconstructed by Meletus as including both impiety and corruption and Socrates is portrayed as a corrupt teacher .the first charge of impiety also originates with Aristophanes but Meletus confuses Socrates with the atheistic Anaxagoras when he describes Socrates as seeking to study the heavens (18a) the second charge of corruption is also in Aristophanes Clouds but confuses Socrates with Protagoras. This led to confusion (18e) of Socrates with other sophists like Gorgias, Prodicus, and Hippias.The new prejudice against Socrates really is because of the Socratic paradox (20c-21a) he knows nothing and only in th is he claims to be wise this paradox aroused hatred against him (21b, 23ab), even though he explains that the knowledge of his ignorance lead to his philosophical mission in life .his mission to question and to seek the unexamined life is no life for a man(21c-23c) this is explained by Chaerephons enquiry at Apollos oracle at Delphi declaring Socrates the wisest of men (21b-) Socrates turns this philosophical interrogation into his philosophical purpose ,as a consequence the young followed him trying to copy his questions to their leaders (23c) this arose the charge of corrupting the youth ( 23d) since like Socrates, they also questioned the leaders of democracy and religion, claiming not to believe in the gods and discover the heavens (d) .Having in mind all theses accusations Socrates, should had defend himself better but that was not the case. Throughout the trial, he acted as though he wanted to lose the case. He went out of his way to antagonize the jury, making comments that associated himself with certain people and ideas that were offensive to the jury.